The NSX and 911 GTS might not be obvious foes, so we expected the unexpected—and still came away somewhat surprised.
www.motortrend.com
Motortrend reviewers essentially rate the 911 GTS as being a better car in every possible way than the NSX Type S (acceleration, lateral grip, steering, braking, etc.).
Which is a shame, because just look at them next to each other! The one on the left
without a doubt looks like the all-out, extreme racing machine of the two, while the one on the right looks like... well... boring... tame... common...
View attachment 7597
It must be frustrating for Acura engineers (and NSX fans) for their "best NSX ever" to ultimately get beaten by a "grocery-getter" that costs $43,000 USD less. Heck, it's frustrating for me too, as my brain demands that cars that "look cooler" also be faster, better-handling, etc.
I think it's an interesting discussion to have about looks vs. performance. Which is more important to you as a buyer? For me, I must admit that my brain has never grown out of the "
Looks cool, therefore must be fast" mindset from my childhood. So if you ask me where I'm putting my money, the scales will always tip slightly more towards whatever looks cooler, not on what's necessarily a better driver's car, etc.
Well, I of course cant argue with someone's opinion, as we all have a right to them and I would never try to belittle anyones. However, beauty is in the E o T B and now to give my own opinion, which is slightly different.
1. This angle is not the best angle for the 911, the front is more low key and changes less and less each time the redesign.
2. For me, the NSX has a very "busy" design as they say and I find it totally Japanese (not surprisingly) in its design ethic, way too many more lines and angles than are needed and than are attractive. Its trying to be a Huracan I feel, but does not pull it off IMO. Its a car for them and the american market, not for europe IMO. I dont find any current US car attractive looking either I am afraid, but thats ok, they design cars for their largest market, sensibly, which is the US and not the EU/UK, where they generally fail and dont bother making RHD's as they know they wont sell enough to make it worth it.
I cant get along with it at all. and the back for me, is far worse:
Then the 911 at the back for me is pure elegance and style, minimalism at its best.
The interior of the two cars is also night and day in terms of quality and design. The plastics used, just look at the seats and centre console.
Anyway, my point is, I understand fully what you say, but I, not even owning a modern 911, really appreciate the design of it and for my money and the entry price point I think it is the true competitor to the Emira as the Cayman, although a great car in the V6 guise, is dated looks wise, its a 7/8 year old design now, so its naturally not going to compete with a car designed 2 years ago.
I do however agree that the 911 is boring in how good it is, it does not make you feel alive to drive it, the cheaper models at least, but looks wise, its right up there for me. I guess we will have to see in 5 years how the Emira, which I love design wise too, has stood up to more modern design trends at that time..... the 911 has stood up very well, time and time again and their mid refreshes are something I doubt Lotus will be able to keep up with, outside or inside.
anyway, thats my take
