Lotustoronto
Emira Addict
Sorry.... It was a rant I went on....not meant for you at all!.... Your comment was correct.I’m not sure if that entire text was meant for me or not, I was simply pointing out they’re not the same suspension components.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry.... It was a rant I went on....not meant for you at all!.... Your comment was correct.I’m not sure if that entire text was meant for me or not, I was simply pointing out they’re not the same suspension components.
Thank you, that was additional information I did not know. It still makes me wonder what it is about the Sport/Goodyear combo that's leaving reviewers unsatisfied.Yes, the yellow car is Sports + Goodyears, like the Shadow Grey used for the Monaco and Anglesey tests. Henry wanted a car for another review after the first round of reviews (published in early June) and again asked for Sports, hence why it's the same spec.
A couple of corrections on other points.
The Lotus-specific tyre structures and compounds were primarily developed by Lotus and the manufacturers around the two main applications, so Touring = Goodyears and Sports = Michelins. But the Goodyears were also developed with use on Sports in mind. Lotus wouldn't offer an option (Sports + Goodyears) they hadn't fully developed and tested.
There are three different geometry setups to cater for the three suspension/tyre combinations being offered by Lotus, not just two setups based on suspension:
So cars leaving the factory will have their geometry optimised for the suspension and tyre you specify.
- Touring + Goodyears
- Sports + Goodyears
- Sports + Michelins
These geo setups will be published in the owners manual, as with previous Lotus cars. So if you switch tyres you'll know which setup adjustments to make.
You don't necessarily have to make the changes if you switch. For example if you run Sports + Goodyears as a road car and have a second set of wheels with Michelins you swap onto the car for a few track days each year. You might notice the slight differences near the limit from not changing the geo to match.
It's also possible to do Touring + Michelins as an option for someone who runs their Emira as a road car with a spare set of wheels with Michelins for track days. Gavan confirmed this was also a valid setup, although not offered by Lotus on new cars. If there isn't a geometry setup in the owners manual for this I'm sure one will be available via other routes.
People will also experiment with other tyre choices and geometry setups and I'm sure those will get shared on here and other forums, as has happened for the previous cars.
As for track times.... I do think a proper set up Emira can beat a Cayman GTS at the Ring... Reason Below;
Emira - 1:18:50
BMW M5 (f10)- 1:18:58 - Closest to Emira's time without Cup 2's and Best Geo setup for track.
BMW M5 (f10) - 7:55 Ring time
Cayman GTS 4.0 - 7:40 (Porsche time in PDK)
I think it can take a Cayman GTS time, with Cup 2's Manual vs Manual. With a pro Lotus driver that knows the car inside and out, I don't really look at non manufacturer times as it comes down to the driver, especially in a manual. A caveat the M5 will have more power in the straights which benefits it, I know.
A GT4 Time is 7:32 (PDK). That will be for the next Emira version to beat.
A Lotus developed at Hethel on it's track as the last ICE needs to perform on track. I don't care about 0-60 times or HP. But these Lotus needs to keep up on track.
I know they don't, just thought they should. Maybe for the track version of the Emira coming up. Or one of the faster i4 variants in the future. Just looked up a 992 GT3 time - 6:55.4 ... That is outrageous, and Anglesey in 1:12.8. Sorry not to derail the thread - back to CarfectionLotus doesn't test at the Ring and consequently the cars really aren't set up for the Ring either. That said, the AMS Supertest of the Lotus Evora 400 resulted in a time of 7:59 on PSS tires (so not Cup 2s).
I only watched it once and I dont really want to watch it again, but I guess everyone has their own take and I am happy you are happy, really!.. I am underwhelmed on the other hand, but past caring now. I would just say, when he spoke about bends, it seemed very much to me as if he was saying long slow curves are great (as they would be perhaps in even a mini bus), but tighter corners, without being at the limit I felt, are a struggle and not as enjoyable.Ok, help me out here. I watched the review twice and am stretched to understand all the angst. For me it was a glowing review that describes the car I always expecting Lotus to deliver. It makes me even more excited to get to experience the “Lotus” style of motoring.
Literally the only negative I heard was how the car pushes in tight corners at the limit. Hell, my 718 Spyder did exactly the same thing on a GT spec suspension with Cup 2’s. It doesn’t do that anymore because I had the alignment changed. In reality this comment is more an inditement of the tire, not the car. And I’ve said this before, take a GT4/Spyder and swap in the optional PS4S 3 season tires Porsche allows you to spec and it does exactly the same thing but you don’t see Rennlist exploding about how “disappointed” everyone is…….
It's just a misconception. We heard a few times that Sports with Goodyears performs not perfect on track and Cup2s do a better job. That's logic, but that doesn't make it a bad setup. Touring with Goodyears performs even worse on track and still, no-one complains about that.Thank you, that was additional information I did not know. It still makes me wonder what it is about the Sport/Goodyear combo that's leaving reviewers unsatisfied.
Well, Porsche seem to be carrying on with ICE cars for a few years more. Prob longer than Lotus. It’s just Lotus who’ve said this is it.Its interesting this whole last ICE car, and is the Emira the last developed ICE car of them ALL? Not just Lotus, but anyone's? Who else has developed a "brand new" petrol car and released it within the last year and who else will do so over the next few years? Im not talking about derivatives here, ie a BMW 1 series new M or new GT3 of the 992 or 992.2 next year etc, but a NEW CAR.
Could this be the very last one?
If it is, it will only help residuals for all models. I probably wouldn't keep a car just as I thought it would go up in value, not for long anyway, but it certainly wouldn't hurt the argument for getting one, which in turn helps residuals. The dealers also need to try to control the used markets a little bit, with some help from Lotus.
In some ways it could have been a disaster developing one of the last ICE cars, but in other ways and if Lotus play their cards right, it could be a fortunate decision. They are 3 - 0 up with 15 mins to play, its really in their hands now, Comms is losing them a goal every few minutes though...
Thanks Tom. This was my understanding also. Good to have it confirmed re the tyre choices. The Sports + Goodyears I had wasn’t a random choice, it was advised to me as a very good U.K. A & B road all weather choice.Yes, the yellow car is Sports + Goodyears, like the Shadow Grey used for the Monaco and Anglesey tests. Henry wanted a car for another review after the first round of reviews (published in early June) and again asked for Sports, hence why it's the same spec.
A couple of corrections on other points.
The Lotus-specific tyre structures and compounds were primarily developed by Lotus and the manufacturers around the two main applications, so Touring = Goodyears and Sports = Michelins. But the Goodyears were also developed with use on Sports in mind. Lotus wouldn't offer an option (Sports + Goodyears) they hadn't fully developed and tested.
There are three different geometry setups to cater for the three suspension/tyre combinations being offered by Lotus, not just two setups based on suspension:
So cars leaving the factory will have their geometry optimised for the suspension and tyre you specify.
- Touring + Goodyears
- Sports + Goodyears
- Sports + Michelins
These geo setups will be published in the owners manual, as with previous Lotus cars. So if you switch tyres you'll know which setup adjustments to make.
You don't necessarily have to make the changes if you switch. For example if you run Sports + Goodyears as a road car and have a second set of wheels with Michelins you swap onto the car for a few track days each year. You might notice the slight differences near the limit from not changing the geo to match.
It's also possible to do Touring + Michelins as an option for someone who runs their Emira as a road car with a spare set of wheels with Michelins for track days. Gavan confirmed this was also a valid setup, although not offered by Lotus on new cars. If there isn't a geometry setup in the owners manual for this I'm sure one will be available via other routes.
People will also experiment with other tyre choices and geometry setups and I'm sure those will get shared on here and other forums, as has happened for the previous cars.
Let’s face it: if you want the best performing track car, don’t buy the Emira!It's just a misconception. We heard a few times that Sports with Goodyears performs not perfect on track and Cup2s do a better job. That's logic, but that doesn't make it a bad setup. Touring with Goodyears performs even worse on track and still, no-one complains about that.
If you want the best track car, you have to go Sports and Cup2s, if you want the easiest possible daily driver, you go Touring with Goodyears. If you are going for Sports suspension with Goodyears, you will get the sportier driving experience up until 8-9/10ths, but you also have three season tires that don't wear like crazy and don't scream at you when driving fast. That's looking at it the positive way. Others might say you have the worse performing tires with the more uncomfortable suspension. All just perspective.
What reviewers seem to want from the Sports/Goodyear setup is having the sportier suspension with tires performing as good as a semi slick without being one. Unfortunately until now, there is no tire with all the benefits of a semi slick, but without all its downsides.
Let’s face it: if you want the best performing track car, don’t buy the Emira!
If you do track an Emira with Goodyears, you’ll still have a lot of fun though.
I’ve said before many times on here: Goodyears aren’t the greatest of tyres. Mates have had them on the hallowed Porsche GT/Spyders and despised them. Ruined those cars.
My worry is finding 18’s that will fit around the stock calipers. I notice the GT4 is running Wilwoods and I could swear it’s a smaller(!) disc up front.- Anyone serious about any kind of track time isn't likely going to be rolling on 20" with goodyear or cup2s. They'll likely be seeking some 18" with a dedicated track tire that will manage consistent grip throughout the 20min x 20-25 sessions.
Plenty around suburban roundabouts in modified cars though! And some are very good at it!
The Goodyears are one of the two best tires available on the market for the use case they are developed for besides the Michelin Pilot Sport 4s. Their use case simply isn‘t track driving.Let’s face it: if you want the best performing track car, don’t buy the Emira!
If you do track an Emira with Goodyears, you’ll still have a lot of fun though.
I’ve said before many times on here: Goodyears aren’t the greatest of tyres. Mates have had them on the hallowed Porsche GT/Spyders and despised them. Ruined those cars.
As they say ”opinions are like Aholes and everyone has one!” Thanks for sharing your brilliant review.Everyone before Henry’s review: I cannot wait for his review. He is very objective and is a great reviewer. I am sure it will be positive and eases everyone’s minds.
After his review: I don’t understand why they would give him that suspension setup (same question asked on Jethro’s review). It’s still a glowing review (even though it isn’t and not sure why people are kidding themselves).
It’s fun reading comments defending Lotus. Sorry to say but I don’t think the Emira is what it’s all cracked up to be. The $100M investment has made a difference but not one that wows. I have doubts Lotus be that serious of a contender in the future with EV. The purchase experience sucks and the car is simply underwhelming. The fairytale is over guys…
The purchase experience sucks .... tickEveryone before Henry’s review: I cannot wait for his review. He is very objective and is a great reviewer. I am sure it will be positive and eases everyone’s minds.
After his review: I don’t understand why they would give him that suspension setup (same question asked on Jethro’s review). It’s still a glowing review (even though it isn’t and not sure why people are kidding themselves).
It’s fun reading comments defending Lotus. Sorry to say but I don’t think the Emira is what it’s all cracked up to be. The $100M investment has made a difference but not one that wows. I have doubts Lotus be that serious of a contender in the future with EV. The purchase experience sucks and the car is simply underwhelming. The fairytale is over guys…