Is this confirmed news ?
https://www.ft.com/.../dc5948e6-6645-405b-a556-df06b1ad26be
https://www.ft.com/.../dc5948e6-6645-405b-a556-df06b1ad26be
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You responded to me, you go Reread MY post. I specifically say that people will always care about specific models, where they are built, what factories, etc.Serious question, are you drunk?
I don’t think you’re even reading what I wrote or responding to it. Your response is so incoherent I feel like you might be quoting me but responding to someone else?
Just reread what I wrote it’s very clear.
I never even mentioned the GTR.
Yeah but what if you already own facilities and people. Ones who aren't building as many cars as you had hoped because the side brand attached to Volvo didn't catch? Do you let that facility sit empty, or do you start adding more models.Article on PH which sums it up nicely https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-britishcars/so-its-come-to-this-lotus-mulls-hethel-closure/50014
I think all this talk of moving production to the US is a distraction. It takes years and huge investment to build a plant, train a workforce, set up new supply chains etc and Lotus does not have that much time when it is in such a precarious financial position. Furthermore no rational business will make such a decision when the tariff situation in the US changes literally week to week ( by rational I'm talking Geely here, as PH suggests, Lotus management are in la la land).
I looked it up over curiosity and that final assembly strategy doesn’t work. The cost of manufacturing needs to exceed 75%+ to avoid US tariffs. Final assembly could not account for that much. The other variable is that this could all change in 4 years.I wonder if a solution to the US tariff problem would be to ship over part-built cars to some kind of facility in the USA, to be completed there.
The i4 was necessary to sell the emira in China and other Asian countries that tax by cylinder. I don’t think it was a bad move at all.
China is the largest auto market in the world and geely owns a controlling stake in Lotus. They have to be able to sell their cars there.
You responded to me, you go Reread MY post. I specifically say that people will always care about specific models, where they are built, what factories, etc.
BMW i3 vs M3. Nissan Versa vs Nissan GT-R. The prior in these cases no one cares where they are built unlike the later
You did not read, and instead rushed to be right on the Internet by saying
"With those examples you are wrong. They’re literally produced in a country other than their origin and they have plenty of demand"
Notice.. notice how you are wrong, but call me drunk and confused? I am clearly not talking broadly about the entire brand in my post. I am speaking to the fact that there are Nissans...and then there are GT-Rs. You cannot treat the brand as a single entity and every consumer the same as any other.
The cars people care about and the companies stake their reputations on are built in county of origin.
You’re not discussing this in good faith you keep rambling and not addressing the examples I mentioned... I guess you’re just trolling. Good luck in life
This ^ - There was a report from three years ago (approx) that this was always being planned FYI. - if (and this is a big IF), Lotus moves / adds it's EV/Hybrid lifestyle car manufacturing to the US (for North American market) and price them in the 100K range as originally thought, I do believe they will sell a lot more than people think.Have a different source that says they do have plans to build Lotus with a partner in the US but it may not be the British car range.
Reading between the lines — either BEVs or Hybrid cars likely built at the Volvo factory in NC.
Seems a whole lot more plausible now doesn’t it?
Absolutely. They need a solution to the US tariff problem before they launch the TYP 134 later this year. They have to position that vehicle for success, or Lotus really will be finished.Have a different source that says they do have plans to build Lotus with a partner in the US but it may not be the British car range.
Reading between the lines — either BEVs or Hybrid cars likely built at the Volvo factory in NC.
Seems a whole lot more plausible now doesn’t it?
Type 134 will not be released this year - It is the Eletre that will first get the hybrid powertrain this year and on sale in 2026. This was confirmed in the Q1 reporting.Absolutely. They need a solution to the US tariff problem before they launch the TYP 134 later this year. They have to position that vehicle for success, or Lotus really will be finished.
Nope. That's not what the CEO said in the investor call earlier this week. This is the product pipeline he presented. You can see that the "new model" TYP 134 is set to debut later this year and go on sale in Q1 2026. He described it as a "world first hyper performance PHEV".Type 134 will not be released this year - It is the Eletre that will first get the hybrid powertrain this year and on sale in 2026. This was confirmed in the Q1 reporting.
“The first model with the Hyper Hybrid PHEV technology will be unveiled at the end of the year, with sales starting in the first quarter of 2026, Feng said on the call. Autocar has separately confirmed that the model will be a version of the Eletre electric SUV.”Nope. That's not what the CEO said in the investor call earlier this week. This is the product pipeline he presented. You can see that the "new model" TYP 134 is set to debut later this year and go on sale in Q1 2026. He described it as a "world first hyper performance PHEV".
View attachment 66616
Where is the Type 135?Nope. That's not what the CEO said in the investor call earlier this week. This is the product pipeline he presented. You can see that the "new model" TYP 134 is set to debut later this year and go on sale in Q1 2026. He described it as a "world first hyper performance PHEV".
View attachment 66616