Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't disagree with him, but as a journalist he should say WHY a car is not easy to drive. Is the balance off? are the controls too heavy? is the chassis difficult to read? is it struggling for grip? A car should be engaging but not fight you.The prevailing mindset of mainstream auto jornualists ....
It's the reason why so many don't have any credibility when critiquing the Emira.
View attachment 68244
“Antony finds the steering exaggeratedly jittery.”
No doubt because they have never driven/owned a Cayman. The Emira looks like a supercar so it is assumed it is.Many people I've spoke to, see the cayman/boxster as the poor mans 911, and the Emira as Lotus top oof the range lol
M2, Mustang, Cayman and A110 are far beneath the Emira in style and feedback.
The majority of modern auto journalists do not value driving engagement or spend significant time with the vehicles, rendering their opinions useless to enthusiasts.
Everyday driver, "journalists" who happen to own a Cayman GT4 and Emira V6, both expressed that the Cayman GT4 cannot match the Emira's responsiveness, engagement, fun or sense of occasion.
Emira is a niche product with limited appeal except to the most die hard auto enthusiasts who value the art of driving. That's where it differs from the mainstream M2, Mustang, A110 and Cayman, which all need hotter versions to be taken seriously as the lower models are inadequate for the task. Those cars are all meant to be less responsive and easier to drive, which is preferred by the mainstream.
Meanwhile, even the base emira is immediately in a different league from those pedestrian models with its bonded aluminum construction more reminiscent of a race car than a road car.
There's an awful lot of people biased against the Emira due to Lotus's poor handling of the Emira launch/delivery, quality control and the poor customer service not just for owners but for prospective buyers, dealers, reviewers and the press. Such a shame for probably one of the best cars Lotus have ever made. Everyone raves about the Evora and the Emira is very similar but with a great interior and amazing looks, so when considering just the car itself reviews should be even better.Evo does seem a bit biased against the Emira.
Totally agree. I've mentioned this in a couple of different contexts. Unfortunately, even some owners aren't good at conveying where concerns really lay. The reality is Lotus has put out and continues to put out incredible cars with incredible value especially when compared to the cars that keep up that are multiples of their cost (in most cases). People just have to know (and accept) that service and customer care run on a shoestring budget and have to accept what that really means (a non luxury experience). If you can get past that, you will likely enjoy your car a lot more. Also, many people pretend like they have never owned a non-luxury brand. For a guy that grew up with Hondas, Suzuki, and Volkswagen, I can tell you Lotus is not any worse and I personally have had some really good Lotus service experiences including interactions from Corp., that I thought weren't required, but done by them anyway.There's an awful lot of people biased against the Emira due to Lotus's poor handling of the Emira launch/delivery, quality control and the poor customer service not just for owners but for prospective buyers, dealers, reviewers and the press. Such a shame for probably one of the best cars Lotus have ever made. Everyone raves about the Evora and the Emira is very similar but with a great interior and amazing looks, so when considering just the car itself reviews should be even better.
Evora sold about 6,100 units in its life cycle over 12 years. Emira has sold 10K+ in 3 years - big difference and I think it shows that the Emira is a "better" car than the Evora was.I get that Lotus completely mishandled the pricing. You can’t imply or tell everyone the car is going to be significantly cheaper than it will be once at the dealership and available for purchase.
That being said, the automotive press didn’t crow about the price of the Evora GT, which when similarly optioned and adjusted for inflation, cost as much or more than the Emira.
The Evora GT has a charm of its own- if the Emira hadn’t been built, I would be driving one today. But I don’t understand the pass that car got and gets for price and quality while the Emira gets picked apart under a microscope. I have driven both, and the Emira is a “nicer” car for the money.
It’s like they were happy to pay more for a less-refined, cottage built car with “quirks”. Makes no sense to me.
Vehicle | HP | Weight (lbs) | Lbs/HP |
---|---|---|---|
Evora 400 | 400 | 3,120 | 7.80 |
Corvette Stingray | 455 | 3,298 | 7.25 |
Vehicle | HP | Weight (lbs) | Lbs/HP |
---|---|---|---|
Lotus Emira V6 | 400 | ~3,200 | 8.00 |
2025 Corvette C8 | 495 | ~3,535 | 7.14 |
Evora sold about 6,100 units in its life cycle over 12 years. Emira has sold 10K+ in 3 years - big difference and I think it shows that the Emira is a "better" car than the Evora was.
The reason car mag's were easier on the Evora than Emira is the difference of when they were launched. Evora was being created in the mid 2000's (launched in '09). 15 years later there is an expectation for increased performance and while it is true that over the first "base" Evora the Emira is a lot quicker, the Evora 400 (same powertrain as Emira) was unveiled in 2015. That's ten years ago. To make this a little clearer;
Vehicle HP Weight (lbs) Lbs/HP Evora 400 400 3,120 7.80 Corvette Stingray 455 3,298 7.25
Vehicle HP Weight (lbs) Lbs/HP Lotus Emira V6 400 ~3,200 8.00 2025 Corvette C8 495 ~3,535 7.14
The Emira went in the wrong direction over the course of ten years. Even more so when you compare a C7 to a C8 - that is a proper 10 years of evolution in today's car environment. Note; I didn't even use the Evora GT numbers, as that would just be worse.
I don't think it's so much that the Emira is a bad car, it's just that it did not move the needle enough from an Evora 400 that came out 10 years ago. I don't think there is an example of any car evolution that went down in performance over ten years... Yes, I get that the Evora is a difference car than an Emira... but is it really? Or does Lotus want that to be the narrative and the auto journalists aren't bitting.
The Emira is a better car, but not a better sports car. That's why it terms of pricing they left it about the same as the Evora - otherwise I don't think Lotus could sell many Emira's at Porsche 911 price points.
Sssshh... stop it with your probably correct opinions - you are annoying us dinosaur V6 owners that stubbornly want to play with our gear knobs when driving.This may be controversial, but I don’t understand is why the V6 is held up as the pinnacle of Emira development to date. Surely the turbo in 400hp guise represents progress, certainly in terms of outright performance?
This.I just think it's just fun to kick Lotus when they're down. After all, the mainstream press was pretty excited about this car when it was released. It's not until now - 3+ years later - that they suddenly have a change of heart. I imagine because Lotus isn't able to buy big advertisements with them, it makes them an easy target.
I haven't seen a review yet that explains what they mean by "twitchy". I think "twitchy" implies random, unexpected movements - what we actually have is steering that is much more communicative than a car like the Cayman - that's one of the reasons I prefered it over the Cayman on my test drives. There's nothing random or unexpected about the Emira's steering. Feels like lazy journalism to me.Ferrari had a similar issue with the 360 Modena; contemporary reviews said it was twitchy and not confidence inspiring.
Yeah - "twitchy" could imply either tram lining or bump steer, neither of which my Emira does (nor any others I have driven). But if the alignment is out you could definitely get either. It's just such a vague term to use, they could mean anything really."twitchy" from a driver's review perspective usually means prone to tram lining or grippy to slight steering wheel movements. It can definitely be tuned out with additional "toe-in". For anyone interested, more "toe-out" would create a condition where the car is more prone to tram lining.
Sssshh... stop it with your probably correct opinions - you are annoying us dinosaur V6 owners that stubbornly want to play with our gear knobs when driving.![]()